View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
150 E Tec on 1996 17'6" Outrage II
sparis
#1 Print Post
Posted on 08/05/07 - 7:41 PM
Member

Posts: 2
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/29/07

I am considering repowering from a 1996 Johnson 115 to a new 150 E Tec on a 1996 17'6" Outrage II. Has anyone had any experience with repowering to the E Tec which weighs around 430 lbs versus 320 or so with the 115 Johnson. I figure the 150 will allow me to run at a lower RPM and save engine wear but am worried about the weight issue. I do have some problems with porpoising and may go to trim tabs at some point. Thanks in advance for the input. Stan

 
Joe Kriz
#2 Print Post
Posted on 08/05/07 - 8:59 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

Stan,

The 17' Outrage II is rated up to 150 hp.... so, no problem there....
Weight of the E-Tec engine is also NO problem at all....
The 115 hp is actually a little underpowered as far as I am concerned as I owned a 1997 Outrage 17' II for awhile...
http://users.sisqtel.net/jkriz/Outrag...age17.html

I would like to know which holes your engine is mounted in now?
If it is all the way down, then this may be causing the porpoise problem.

 
DelawareDan
#3 Print Post
Posted on 08/05/07 - 11:24 PM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 328
Comments: 2
Joined: 05/24/07

Stan, welcome. I'm in the market for a 115 for my 16'6. Let me know!

 
WhalerDan
#4 Print Post
Posted on 08/06/07 - 6:00 AM
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 245
Comments: 1
Joined: 11/13/05

I owned a 17 with a 115 Merc and always wanted more power. I think you should be fine with the added weight. What you can do is put 100 pounds of weight on your transom and see if the static trim becomes an issue. I used to get a bit too much water through the side scuppers until I replaced them with a new set. Finding the right trim for you engine in various conditions should help with porpoising. A Doel Fin would help too -- in my opinion.

 
sparis
#5 Print Post
Posted on 08/06/07 - 8:08 AM
Member

Posts: 2
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/29/07

I believe it is in the third hole down from the top hole..i.e. the engine can go one more hole higher on the transom. I had it raised a couple of years ago and it helped. I will double check. Have tried the Doel type fins but did little to help. Want to go to more HP. Next issue will be properly propping the 150 E Tec

 
Joe Kriz
#6 Print Post
Posted on 08/06/07 - 9:27 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

Sounds like you have the engine high enough.

Maybe a different type of prop would help but then, get the new engine first....

 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 26, 2024 - 9:52 PM
Visit our Sponsors
Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories


Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 4
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.18 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,563,165 unique visits