View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

2001 honda 90 4 stroke outboard w 1400hrs
Move on Move on 100%[5 Votes]
Continue looking at it Continue looking at it 0%[0 Votes]
Total Votes : 5
 Print Thread
2001 honda 90 4 stroke outboard - opinions please
jeepthing
#1 Print Post
Posted on 06/05/14 - 8:29 AM
User Avatar
Member

Posts: 2
Comments: 0
Joined: 05/02/14

Hello all,

I recently purchased a 1964 Sakonnet 16 that did not include a motor, so I have been watching the market the last month for a used one. I came across a 2001 Honda 90 4-stroke that has my interested peaked. The price is only $2,000 because its been heavily used by a fisherman with over 1400hrs on it. Basically its been a four season workhorse that's been run almost daily. The owner cant couldn't say enough about this motor and readily inviting me to do a compression test, so at this point I'm assuming compression will check out. Before I drive the 1.5 hours to go see this engine, I thought it might be good to throw it up on the forum for opinions.

My price range is $2000 to $3000 so it's looking like it would be between this engine and or lesser used 2000 - 2005 2 stroke.

Additionally this motor comes in at 360lbs! I know the 90hp falls within the manufactures specs but did they know in the 60's that 90hp 4 strokes would be that heavy. My transom seems to be in real good shape, but still its a 1964.

Thanks for any opinions or personal experiences.

 
rvschulz
#2 Print Post
Posted on 06/05/14 - 9:19 AM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 145
Comments: 0
Joined: 06/28/10

my concern is not necessarily the weight as I think by moving a few things around it can balance out nicely - my Etec is 375 and my boat does not lean sternward.

but ... 2001 ... no. I think you can get newer AND newer technology for that price or newer but older technology which is more bulletproof.


1987 Montauk 17, 2013 Etec 115
 
Phil T
#3 Print Post
Posted on 06/05/14 - 9:43 AM
User Avatar
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums

Posts: 7043
Comments: 6
Joined: 03/26/05

I voted to "move on" for reasons already stated.

While that series of motor is very good and the hours are not excessive, it is heavy. I have a friend with an 1980's Montauk and this engine and is sits pretty low.



 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 23, 2024 - 4:43 PM
Visit our Sponsors
Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories


Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 4
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.14 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,548,681 unique visits