View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
1998 Mercury 90 hp mounting height
redz350
#1 Print Post
Posted on 05/13/14 - 12:03 PM
Member

Posts: 2
Comments: 0
Joined: 06/25/13

I have a 1998 Mercury 90 hp 2 stoke motor mounted on a 1998 Montauk 17'. The motor is currently mounted all the way down. What should be the best mounting height for this boat and motor combination? I seem to have seen recommencations of 2 or 3 holes up, instead of all the way down. The motor currently is swinging a Quiksilver 12.75"X21" aluminum prop. Currently the boat runs up to about 5,300 RPMs, with just one person aboard. Since I belive this boat was originally sold as a boat an motor package by a Boston Whaler dealer, why would the dealer mount the motor all the way down, if that is not the optimum position? You would think they would know better. Just wondering... Thank you for any help that can be provided!

Peter

 
Joe Kriz
#2 Print Post
Posted on 05/13/14 - 12:16 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

It can depend on the prop.

However, I would mount it 2 holes up to start.
It that isn't enough, then mount it up further as needed.
http://www.whalercentral.com/articles...cle_id=106

 
Finnegan
#3 Print Post
Posted on 05/13/14 - 12:35 PM
Member

Posts: 1926
Comments: 16
Joined: 05/02/08

The mid-range Mercurys, 75-125HP have a "taller" than normal mid-section, that is the distance from the underside of the transom bracket hook to the anti-ventilation plate is a greater dimension than most other outboards. Why they did that I do not know, but Mercury themselves say these engines should accordingly be mounted higher. When I installed a pair of these on my Outrage 18, replacing the previous Merc in-line 6's, I confirmed they needed to be run about an inch higher than the older Mercs.

I think Joe's suggestion of 2 holes up (mount engine in middle set of the five hole pattern) is a good starting point. At this height, the 21" Black Max aluminum should still give good performance, but for max all around performance, a 20" Laser II would be ideal. With the Laser you may be able to go up one more bolt hole.

 
redz350
#4 Print Post
Posted on 06/03/14 - 1:33 PM
Member

Posts: 2
Comments: 0
Joined: 06/25/13

Joe and Finnegan. Thank you very much for your informative and helpful responses!

Peter

 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 23, 2024 - 4:44 PM
Visit our Sponsors
Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories


Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 9
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.15 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,548,688 unique visits