View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
Which engine to my outrage
Geting
#1 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/13 - 1:40 PM
Member

Posts: 11
Comments: 0
Joined: 08/04/12

I will have to buy a new enginento my Outrage 19 from 1993 but nut sure which to go for. I actually bought a new Suzuki 140 hp but am not happy as there is too much vibration. Had a Honda 130 BF from 1998 before which was very good but heavy. Now i am thinking about a 150 or 175 hp Suzuki instead of The smaller 140 hp but am not sure if it will help to reduce vibrations. In addition, the heavier engine will make the back part of the deck wet again. Futthermore, the hp limit is 150 hp according to the plate. Any ideas what i better do? (Preferably other than buying a new boat)

 
kamie
#2 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/13 - 1:54 PM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 2975
Comments: 3
Joined: 11/04/05

What holes in the mounting plate were used to mount the engine to the transom. It could be that the engine is mounted too low

 
Joe Kriz
#3 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/13 - 2:02 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

As kamie mentions, what holes are the bolts mounted in now?
http://www.whalercentral.com/articles...cle_id=106

Here are the Current Choices and Weights for the newer motors.
http://www.whalercentral.com/articles...ticle_id=6

From what we hear, the Suzuki is a good motor but it still weighs in @485 pounds.

 
Phil T
#4 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/13 - 2:04 PM
User Avatar
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums

Posts: 7043
Comments: 6
Joined: 03/26/05

I think we may be able to troubleshoot the vibration problem.

What propeller (brand and size) is on the engine?

At what speed (rpm and mph) is the "vibration"? Do you feel it the vibration in the hull or does a railing or part vibrate?


 
Geting
#5 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/13 - 12:20 PM
Member

Posts: 11
Comments: 0
Joined: 08/04/12

Thanks for replying. Currently I have a 140 hp Suzuki, new engine, have tried to mounting upwards but did not help, vibrations mainly on lowest rph forward and at 3000 rpm. Fine at say 2000 and 4000 rpm, the guys will try another plare in aluminium and wood to see if it becomes better, if not, i am thinking about more cylinder volume in form of Suzuki 150 or 175 hp but not sure what is better for the boat (that has an official maximum at 150 hp) What would you do?

 
wading mark
#6 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/13 - 1:13 PM
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 94
Comments: 0
Joined: 11/13/06

Man, if you can swing it, that Suzuki 175 is a fine engine. Good on fuel, too.

 
kamie
#7 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/13 - 2:03 PM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 2975
Comments: 3
Joined: 11/04/05

Not sure if this is the case with the 19 Outrage hull but I know that 90HP E-Tec have caused vibrations on some 16/17 hulls at specific RPMs.

Where is the engine mounted, and what prop do you have on it currently. I realize you indicated that it was raised with no effect but resolving things like this requires systematic trial and error testing.

The decision to power at or above the capacity plate is entirely yours, it really depends on your level of risk and what your willing to accept.

 
Marko888
#8 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/13 - 3:27 PM
Member
Project Albums

Posts: 413
Comments: 10
Joined: 05/26/08

Perhaps some other DF140 owners will chime in here. It seems odd that there are vibration issues with this install, when most describe the DF140 as sewing machine smooth.

I would look carefully at all connections to the engine, to make sure the vibes are not coming from one of the attachment's to the engine having an interference issue, such as the steering system or control cables making light contact with other hard parts. I would also try a different prop.

 
rwethereyet
#9 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/13 - 6:46 PM
Member

Posts: 51
Comments: 0
Joined: 12/12/10

I have a 1992 outrage 19 I with a 2012 suzuki DF140. Engine is smooth and quiet. Initially, I had a slight vibration when running idle. It went away after 20-30 hours of use. Not sure what was causing it....? I attributed the vibration to the size of the prop and break in...? I am using a suzuki stainless prop 14 x 22 (part # 99105-00700-22P). Hope this helps......


rwethereyet
1992 Outrage 19' I, 2012 Suzuki DF 140
 
Geting
#10 Print Post
Posted on 09/28/13 - 1:14 AM
Member

Posts: 11
Comments: 0
Joined: 08/04/12

Thanks everybody, i will certainly try another propellar, if it does not become better, i will probably invest in a larger cylinder volume such as the 175 hp Suzuki, expensive but perhaps worth it. I have always wondered what is the reason behind a highest recommended engine. Is if because of speed or weight?

 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 23, 2024 - 11:47 PM
Visit our Sponsors
Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories


Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 7
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.18 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,550,356 unique visits