View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
Short or Long Shaft
markvm
#1 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 8:27 AM
Member

Posts: 22
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/10/10

I have a 1972 13' Sport, and want to know if it should be fitted with a short or long shaft outboard. I am planning a re-power with a cool vintage Mercury. Can anyone help on that?

Thanks,

Mark


1967 Sakonnet w/ 1964 Merc 1000s
 
Joe Kriz
#2 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 8:59 AM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

See this "Frequently Asked Question" under the FAQ link on the left sidebar.
What Year is my Whaler/13' Year Differences.
http://www.whalercentral.com/viewpage...age_id=155

 
markvm
#3 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 9:11 AM
Member

Posts: 22
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/10/10

Thanks, I have a full splashwell, blue interior, smirkless bow, and notched transom, so it sounds like I need a short shaft and my boat is from 71 or older.

Mark


1967 Sakonnet w/ 1964 Merc 1000s
 
Joe Kriz
#4 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 9:13 AM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

Yes, all notched transoms take a 15 inch shaft unless the transom is built up with some type of a bracket.

 
Gamalot
#5 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 2:24 PM
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 1086
Comments: 3
Joined: 06/21/10

I don't know if the 13' hulls have the same issues as the Montauks but it was fairly common back then to mount the engines all the way down and sitting on the transom sill.

Read some of the info regarding engine mounting to see if your hull and motor do better with the engine raised up a hole or two.

As long as you are changing the motor you might as well tap the collective wisdom here and mount the new vintage motor at the best height.

Gary

 
markvm
#6 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 3:51 PM
Member

Posts: 22
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/10/10

Thanks guys,

I have just finished reading a lot of information on here about mounting heights, particularly a thread about 16' 7" hulls. I read a lot of the advantages of mounting the engine higher, and would just like to know with my 13' sport, how can I tell if my 1969 Merc 350 should be mounted all the way down (which it currently is) or up a few holes. Also when everyone is referring to up a hole or two are they taking about hole location based on the diagram I saw in articles, or based on existing transom holes versus the holes on the engine mount? Any help will be appreciated. I also wonder if there is an optimum dimension that the prop should sit below the bottom of the hull and if that should be the factor of the mounting height.

Thanks,

Mark


1967 Sakonnet w/ 1964 Merc 1000s
 
Joe Kriz
#7 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 4:00 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

The holes in the transom don't move.
The engine has different mounting holes to move up (or down).
Each hole on the engine bracket is spaced 3/4 of an inch apart.
If you move one hole up, you are moving the engine up 3/4 of an inch for each hole you put the bolts through.

The engine is measured by where the cavitation plate is relative to the bottom of the transom.
The cavitation plate should be anywhere from level to 1 1/2 inches above the bottom of the hull or keel.

To obtain optimum engine height (and prop) you must have a tachometer to determine the correct WOT (Wide Open Throttle) speed of your engine according to the suggested Manufacturers specifications.


Edited by Joe Kriz on 09/23/10 - 4:02 PM
 
CES
#8 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/10 - 5:00 PM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 2681
Comments: 7
Joined: 04/27/07

Markvm, welcome to Whaler central.

When I first bought my 1966 13' whaler, the motor was mounted all the way down on the transom. I raised it about an inch and am very glad I did. The performance and handling greatly improved. Just because they mounted them all the way down back then doesnt mean that is the proper position for the motor.

Anyway, If I were you, I'd raise the motor an inch or so. You cavitation plate should be above the keel.


Cliff
1966 13' Sport with a 1993 40hp Yamaha 2 Smoker
 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 25, 2024 - 8:25 AM
Visit our Sponsors
Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas


Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 8
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.16 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,557,509 unique visits