View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
Johnson 175 ocean runner
HarleyFXDL
#1 Print Post
Posted on 05/21/08 - 6:03 PM
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 917
Comments: 30
Joined: 07/24/07

Does anyone know about the Johnson ocean runner engines? I saw a boat with one and I am not sure about the models. I heard the Ficht engine should be avoided like the plague but what about the ocean runners?

 
Joe Kriz
#2 Print Post
Posted on 05/22/08 - 11:19 AM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11434
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

Harley,

You don't mention the year or the size.... ??

However, the Ocean Runners were great engines. Just make sure they are not the Ficht engines from 1998 to 2000...

 
Blue_Northern
#3 Print Post
Posted on 05/23/08 - 7:31 AM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 532
Comments: 5
Joined: 09/04/07

I run a 90hp ocean runner on my Montauk and LOVE it. A friend of mine has the regular 90hp Johnson and a equally sized boat. My Ocean Runner out performs his 20% in speed, fuel economy, and torque.


Rob
1973 Outrage/Lo-Pro Conversion
 
HarleyFXDL
#4 Print Post
Posted on 05/23/08 - 7:45 AM
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 917
Comments: 30
Joined: 07/24/07

Your right Joe, my fault. The year is 1995-2000. The size is the 150-225 hp. I heard the Fichts were the main reason OMC took a dive.

 
Derwd24
#5 Print Post
Posted on 05/23/08 - 8:25 PM
User Avatar
Member

Posts: 1607
Comments: 9
Joined: 05/09/07

They were on the right track for sure. I'd read it was a lubrication issue also, but it was that the engines were tested at high speed mainly and performed well. However, at low speed under load, the combustion temp was too low and soot formed in the cylinders, leading to quick engine failure.

 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
May 16, 2024 - 10:03 PM
Users Online
Welcome
Shaggy
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 6
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,095
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,628
· Sport 13 1,358
· Outrage 18 551
· Nauset 16 399
· Sport 15 364

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.18 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 83,481,914 unique visits