View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
Re-power with a lightly used 2013 Yamaha F40?
rockinhitz34
#1 Print Post
Posted on 02/12/18 - 2:10 PM
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 105
Comments: 0
Joined: 12/17/15

I have the chance to purchase a used (60 hours) 2013 F40 4 stroke from a neighbor. Just motor and prop, he's keeping controls etc. Was wondering what you all thought about its weight (~216lbs depending on the model) for a 13 foot 1969 full splashwell converted super sport. Im currently running a 1985 2 stroke 50 horse merc. Wanting to re-power for power tilt/trim, less noise/pollution, and dependability.

Do these motors have any well known problems? Previous owner had this on a 16' boat and he now wants to water ski behind it so he needs something a bit larger. If anyone runs one, would love to get your thoughts!

Thanks


1969 13' "Super Sport", 1985 50hp Merc
 
max366
#2 Print Post
Posted on 02/12/18 - 2:19 PM
Member

Posts: 77
Comments: 0
Joined: 06/02/15

I'm installing a 2002 F40 on a 1988 13 ft Sport this week. The key issue with these motors (not sure if it applies to a 2013) is the jets easily plug up causing poor performance. I replaced both jets on the carbs with larger ones after I did a extensive ultrasonic cleaning of the carbs. There's a 2 part Youtube video that explains the process in great detail and it's really helpful and correct.

The 3 cylinder 40HP Merc, used on some of the 13 ft Whalers weighs 204 lbs. I did a 1982 13 ft Sport with the 40HP 3 cyl Merc and it ran really well, if that helps.

 
RobertJ
#3 Print Post
Posted on 02/12/18 - 4:14 PM
Member

Posts: 24
Comments: 0
Joined: 03/19/13

max366 wrote: The key issue with these motors (not sure if it applies to a 2013) is the jets easily plug up causing poor performance.


The 2013 model is fuel injected.


1995 Dauntless 15 - 1995 Evinrude 70
 
Phil T
#4 Print Post
Posted on 02/13/18 - 5:19 AM
User Avatar
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums

Posts: 6991
Comments: 6
Joined: 03/26/05

Thats a big weight difference.

If you want to see how the added weight will be, launch the boat and add jugs of water (8 lbs/gallon) or other weights to the rear and observe.

You can help offset the stern weight bias by shifting the fuel tank to under the forward seat (if raised) and battery under driver.




1992 Outrage 17 I
2019 E-TEC 90, Viper 17 2+
2018 Load Rite Elite 18280096VT
 
rockinhitz34
#5 Print Post
Posted on 02/13/18 - 5:36 AM
Member
Personal Page

Posts: 105
Comments: 0
Joined: 12/17/15

Thanks everyone. I'll see about the water jugs thats a brilliant idea. The 50 merc I have now weighs about 185 lbs so adding 31 lbs or so to the transom is not ideal. My battery is stuck in the stern for now based on how I wired it, but I can move the fuel tank up under the forward thwart seat I think. Was thinking about putting a 12 gal tank under there anyways.


1969 13' "Super Sport", 1985 50hp Merc
 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
May 1, 2024 - 2:37 PM
Users Online
Welcome
Bcoleman184
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 18
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,038
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,626
· Sport 13 1,358
· Outrage 18 551
· Nauset 16 398
· Sport 15 363

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.15 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 83,203,959 unique visits