Thread subject: Whaler Central - Boston Whaler Boat Information and Photos :: Anyone have experience with these two motors, Yamaha and Mercury?
Posted by harbor15 on 01/16/10 - 5:58 PM
#1
I'm interested in a couple of small boats. Not looking for a large boat, just something inexpensive yet reliable to use close to shore in calm waters. The plan is to hold onto the boat for quite a while. The decision may come down to the motors as the prices are similar. One has a 1995 Yamaha Pro 50 hp 2-stroke (13' 1995 BW Dauntless). The other has a 2003 40 hp Mercury 4-Stroke (2006) 152cc Key West. I'm awaiting more specific information concerning hours before choosing one to go forward with a survey, but both appear to be clean and okay so far. Thanks.
Posted by HarleyFXDL on 01/17/10 - 6:58 AM
#2
Both are good motors, you need to find out which has the best service in your area. The decision comes down to which boat you prefer. To me there is only one choice ;-)
Posted by burtim on 01/17/10 - 8:41 AM
#3
I have a 2001 40 Hp Mercury and have been quite happy. It is a two stroke though, so I am sure it's a bit different than what you are looking at.
Posted by DWinter on 01/17/10 - 9:11 AM
#4
That "Mercury 4 stroke" is actually built for Mercury by Yamaha. We call them Mercaha's.
Edited by DWinter on 01/17/10 - 1:33 PM
Posted by hevysrf on 01/17/10 - 1:10 PM
#5
I've got a couple of seasons on an early 90's Yamaha pro 50, very light weight, 100 to 1 factory oil ratio, always starts. It's only 700 cc, not much low end for a 50 hp. Carbs like good fuel, but very easy to rebuild when gummed up. Some lower unit corrosion on mine with salt water use. MartyD
Posted by CES on 01/18/10 - 6:02 AM
#6
I'm a Yamaha guy myself, those things are bullet proof.
Posted by harbor15 on 01/18/10 - 7:31 AM
#7
How do 50 hp Suzuki motors compare?
Posted by HarleyFXDL on 01/18/10 - 12:49 PM
#8
All the engines built now are very good. Name any engine manufacturer and there is a die hard group that stands behind it.