Fishing motor for a 17 ft hull
|
orchemo |
Posted on 01/31/16 - 9:41 AM
|
Member
Posts: 23
Comments:
0
Joined: 09/18/15
|
Have a 17 ft hull that verses selling was thinking a out just motoring as a fishing boat.
Pacific Northwest river and a few mountain lakes. No need to go fast
A 25 - 40 hp seems to be a breaking point for very affordable (not an investment) sized motor. I realize bigger is always better, but would a 25 hp 4 stroke be enough?
|
|
|
|
EJO |
Posted on 02/01/16 - 8:04 AM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 669
Comments:
6
Joined: 11/25/12
|
NO, 40hp is probably what you need and you might get by with a 30hp but 25hp is not enough.
I know you're not looking for speed but you probly still want to get the boat on plane and being on a river you have to overcome some kind of flow.
For your safety go with a minimum of 40HP.
Skipper E-J
m/v "Clumsy Cleat" a 2008 Montauk 150 |
|
|
|
Perichbrothers |
Posted on 02/01/16 - 9:02 AM
|
Member
Posts: 141
Comments:
0
Joined: 09/10/15
|
I had an old 50 2-stroke and it was a great motor on a light 17.
For a week had a nicer 40 and was not impressed,
had to work much harder to perform less.
The 50 was cheap fuel and would cruise at 19 high at 26-28.
Now if you just want to put-put around then 25 will work!
TP
|
|
|
|
MG56 |
Posted on 02/01/16 - 11:38 AM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 357
Comments:
0
Joined: 05/11/13
|
orchemo wrote:
Have a 17 ft hull that verses selling was thinking a out just motoring as a fishing boat.
Pacific Northwest river and a few mountain lakes. No need to go fast
A 25 - 40 hp seems to be a breaking point for very affordable (not an investment) sized motor. I realize bigger is always better, but would a 25 hp 4 stroke be enough?
No, a 25 wouldn't be what you want. You have to get to the next block size for the 30-50 or so HP. A little more money but very much value added. You could putt around with a 10hp engine but it is painful. It doesn't get significantly less painful until you jump to the >30hp level, and it is also a lot safer.
|
|
|
|
Whalerbob |
Posted on 02/01/16 - 3:28 PM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 311
Comments:
0
Joined: 12/07/06
|
I'd think 50 HP would be the bare minimum and anything under 70 is a waste. If budget is an issue I'd say look for something used or just put a 9 HP on it because you probably won't really be able to get up on plain with a 25 - 40 anyway.
|
|
|
|
JPB |
Posted on 02/02/16 - 5:45 PM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 103
Comments:
0
Joined: 02/26/09
|
I like the 40hp on my 17'.
|
|
|
|
wlagarde |
Posted on 02/02/16 - 6:40 PM
|
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums
Posts: 442
Comments:
2
Joined: 07/21/13
|
JPB - Are you able to get the hull on the plane with your 40?
1976 Sport 15 w/ 2005 50hp Nissan 2 stroke |
|
|
|
JPB |
Posted on 02/02/16 - 7:26 PM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 103
Comments:
0
Joined: 02/26/09
|
Yes...it gets on plane in a hurry and with a lite load WOT is 32 and will cruise easy at 25 with a full load and 3 men.
Here is a video from when I was testing props.
http://youtu.be/fV1YZY4IFSA
Keep in mind that I am currently running my boat with most of the OE interior removed thus saving weight. You can see in my personal page how it is setup. A 40hp may not work well for everybody but maybe the OP can get some ideas....it works very well for me.
Edited by JPB on 02/02/16 - 7:43 PM |
|
|