View Thread
Before Posting, Please Read Our Posting Guidelines Below.

1. Use the full 4 digit year for everything you are asking your question about. Example: 1962, 1988, 2000, 2011
2. Include the correct name of your Whaler model. Example: Montauk 17, Montauk 170, Outrage 26, Outrage 260
3. Include the length when necessary. Example: 16, 17, 18, 20, 22
4. Do not post your email address anywhere on this site as it is already in your user profile.

 Print Thread
2003 240 Outrage Motor Height?
Chillaxin
#1 Print Post
Posted on 09/22/15 - 9:34 AM
Member

Posts: 4
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/22/15

Hello. Just found this site and it seems to have a ton of great info. I just recently repowered this boat with a 300hp single. The dealer mounted the motor in the same holes as the old motor(all the way down). I feel like it is a bit low. I know I can do the up a hole test, up two holes test and I will. I was really hoping someone had done this before and found a good starting point. Up two? Up one? Right now I'm turning a 18.5 prop and turning 5700rpm WOT. I should be between 5700 and 6300 per manufacturer. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Hopefully, I can return the favor down the road. Thanks again

C-

 
Phil T
#2 Print Post
Posted on 09/22/15 - 1:18 PM
User Avatar
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums

Posts: 7043
Comments: 6
Joined: 03/26/05

Dealers tend to always do the least amount of work.

The motor should be 2 or 3 holes up, depending on the prop selected.

A 18.5 prop is not a helpful description. We need to know Make, Model and size A by B in inches. Is it 3 bladed or 4 and aluminum or stainless.

Many will say you will gain 150 rpm's for each hole you raise the motor so I would raise the motor and retest before changing props..

You want the anti-cavitation plate 1-2 inches above the keel. At medium to high speed, one should be able to see the anti-cav plate out of the water in the boat wake.

 
Chillaxin
#3 Print Post
Posted on 09/22/15 - 2:56 PM
Member

Posts: 4
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/22/15

Thanks for the reply and help. My prop is a stainless 3 x 18.5 x 20 suzuki prop. I agree that the dealerships do the least amount of work. They think I'm crazy to want to raise motor and I know it needs to be. The AV plate is maybe .5" above keel sitting on trailer. Does this help in deciding a good place to start? What other info would help? Thanks again!

C-

 
mb466
#4 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/15 - 6:54 PM
Member

Posts: 76
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/27/09

What kind of speed are you getting out of 300hp? Which engine is it?

I'm considering a repower with a Yamaha 300 or 350. I just want to have an idea what to expect.

I get 37mph off of a 225hp yamaMerc.

 
Chillaxin
#5 Print Post
Posted on 09/23/15 - 7:18 PM
Member

Posts: 4
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/22/15

I had the same 225 as you currently run. I went with the Suzuki 300. It really runs good so far. I'm still playing with top speed and props. With the prop noted above I'm getting real close to 49mph via gps depending on load. I'm turning 5700 rpm at wot. Sweet spot for this motor is between 5700 and 6300 rpm. That's why I think I need to raise the motor up a bit. I think I'm dragging to much motor in the water. The 300 makes the boat into a totally different ride. Much better hole shot etc. What hole is your motor currently mounted? Your top speed is a bit higher than I remember mine being.

 
mb466
#6 Print Post
Posted on 09/25/15 - 11:07 AM
Member

Posts: 76
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/27/09

Mine engine is all of the way down. Sounds like a different boat... Drives like an old Cadillac, very smooth and comfortable. I just don't like pushing the engine over 5000 rpm, which limits me to about 30mph.

I sure would like one of those Yammy 350s with a 4 bladed prop. I guess I have to wait until the original engine bites it. Just not sure how long that will be. It runs so well.

 
Phil T
#7 Print Post
Posted on 09/25/15 - 6:36 PM
User Avatar
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums

Posts: 7043
Comments: 6
Joined: 03/26/05

MB -

Please explain why you don't like pushing your motor past 5k rpm's yet are interested in an additional 125 hp.

 
mb466
#8 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/15 - 5:22 AM
Member

Posts: 76
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/27/09

Phil,
I do run WOT for a few minutes at a time, but I do not like running at high RPMs on longer trips. This is a long standing debate whether WOT or high RPMs is OK or not, which I don't want to get into. Everyone has an opinion. I just don't want to blow the engine in the middle of the Chesapeake miles from home.

The performance of the YamaMerc on this boat is luke warm at best. This engine reportedly only puts out 209hp (despite 225 label). The hole shot is never ending, and the cruising speed is pretty slow. It's difficult to pull waterskiiers. Also, the slower cruising speed limits some of our family outings (kids and wife don't have patience for long rides).

Anyone who owns this original setup longs for having a 300 or a 350 hp on the back of their boat. I'd also settle for twin 150s or 175s.

Because of the power /weight limitations of the current boat setup , I keep my fuel at 1/2 tank or less, and keep the fresh water tank empty unless necessary. This saves close to 600lbs of extra weight to drag around.

Until this engine quits, I'll just continue to learn more about the available engines and enjoy my Cadillac ride. In the future, I look forward to getting places faster, water skiing with the kids, and longer cruises up to Annapolis, which is out of the kids range right now.



 
wlagarde
#9 Print Post
Posted on 09/26/15 - 3:03 PM
User Avatar
Member
Personal Page
Project Albums

Posts: 442
Comments: 2
Joined: 07/21/13

mb466 - If you raise your engine it may improve your hole shot...


Edited by wlagarde on 09/26/15 - 3:30 PM
1976 Sport 15 w/ 2005 50hp Nissan 2 stroke
 
mb466
#10 Print Post
Posted on 09/27/15 - 8:49 AM
Member

Posts: 76
Comments: 0
Joined: 07/27/09

I'll be pulling the boat off the lift in a couple of weeks. I may have the mechanic raise it up a hole or two when they are winterizing it. I cannot remember how far down the cavitation plate is relative to the bottom of the boat. If it is appropriate, I'll get it done. I would hope it would have been set up properly coming from the factory. Its all original.

 
Chillaxin
#11 Print Post
Posted on 10/17/15 - 11:47 AM
Member

Posts: 4
Comments: 0
Joined: 09/22/15

Just got back from testing. Moved the motor up two holes. Which puts mounting hardware in 3rd hole. Lake was rough but managed 6150rpm. Almost hit 50mph. Pretty sure it will easily hit atleast 50 when the water is a bit calmer. Hole shot was alao better. Just thought I'd add this in case someone is looking for a starting point. Thanks
C-

 
Joe Kriz
#12 Print Post
Posted on 10/17/15 - 12:15 PM
User Avatar
Site Owner
Personal Page
Personal Album
Photo Albums
Project Albums

Posts: 11447
Comments: 452
Joined: 03/18/05

Yes, bolt in 3rd hole from the top is mounted "2 Holes Up".
http://www.whalercentral.com/articles...cle_id=106

This seems to be the best all around mounting position for many Whalers.

Some models can take all the way up with the correct prop.

 
Jump to Forum:
Bookmark and Share
Today's Date & Time
November 23, 2024 - 5:34 AM
Visit our Sponsors
Nauset Marine - Whaler Parts and Accessories


Specialty Marine - Parts and Accessories


Carver Covers - The Best Covers Under The Sun


Wm. J. Mills and Co. - Boston Whaler Canvas



Click on logo to visit site
View all Sponsors Here
Users Online
Welcome
AuntiesMontauk
as the newest member

· Guests Online: 7
· Members Online: 0
· Total Members: 50,390
Login
Username

Password

Remember Me


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Top 5 Models Posted
· Montauk 17 1,638
· Sport 13 1,366
· Outrage 18 556
· Nauset 16 402
· Sport 15 365

View all Models Here
Render time: 0.21 seconds Copyright WhalerCentral.com © 2003-2024 86,545,803 unique visits