Hull Weight
|
Beso21 |
Posted on 09/21/14 - 5:39 AM
|
Member
Posts: 23
Comments:
0
Joined: 01/19/13
|
Have a 16' 1966 Custom that was originally a Nauset. I need the hull weight because I am considering the purchase of a Micro Anchor produced by Power Pole. This anchor is made for boats up to 1500 pounds. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Phil T |
Posted on 09/21/14 - 7:19 AM
|
Administrator
Personal Page
Personal Album
Project Albums
Posts: 6985
Comments:
6
Joined: 03/26/05
|
The hull weight was approximately 700-800 lbs when new.
Add battery, fuel, motor and gear and you are at 1500 lbs easy.
Looks pretty undersized to me but I am ocean guy.
|
|
|
|
Beso21 |
Posted on 09/21/14 - 6:58 PM
|
Member
Posts: 23
Comments:
0
Joined: 01/19/13
|
Phil T
I did not ask you if you thought about the anchor system. just hull weight. Ocean Guy
|
|
|
|
Finnegan |
Posted on 09/22/14 - 3:12 PM
|
Member
Posts: 1925
Comments:
16
Joined: 05/02/08
|
I believe the bare hull weight of the 16' hull, 1974 and earlier, was 500#. When equipped as a Nauset interior, the weight was shown as 750#.
|
|
|
|
JRP |
Posted on 09/24/14 - 10:03 AM
|
Member
Posts: 755
Comments:
2
Joined: 08/29/14
|
Beso21 wrote:
Phil T
I did not ask you if you thought about the anchor system. just hull weight. Ocean Guy
Nice way to thank a guy who took the time to answer your question. If you only wanted the weight, there was no need for you to mention the anchor system in your original post, either!
|
|
|
|
aeriksen |
Posted on 09/24/14 - 6:15 PM
|
Member
Posts: 242
Comments:
0
Joined: 07/24/12
|
Sorry to agree, but any reply should be answered with a "Thanks for responding". Other wise you will find no response at all.
|
|
|
|
Humbucker |
Posted on 09/24/14 - 9:01 PM
|
Member
Posts: 11
Comments:
0
Joined: 09/04/14
|
JRP wrote:
If you only wanted the weight, there was no need for you to mention the anchor system in your original post, either!
I was kind of thinking the same thing. Maybe the guy just has poor forum social skills and didn't mean to come across that way. ???
|
|
|
|
thegage |
Posted on 09/25/14 - 4:23 AM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 341
Comments:
1
Joined: 06/25/09
|
JRP wrote:Nice way to thank a guy who took the time to answer your question. If you only wanted the weight, there was no need for you to mention the anchor system in your original post, either!
+1
He sounds like a guy spoiling for an internet fight.
John K.
John Kittredge
1991 16 SL - 2013 E-TEC 90 |
|
|
|
dougt |
Posted on 09/25/14 - 6:02 AM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 179
Comments:
0
Joined: 06/29/14
|
I thought this post was very disrespectful.
When I was a moderator on the Jayco camper forum, he would have gotten 1 warning, post deleted and next time he would have been banned.
JMHO
Edited by dougt on 09/25/14 - 6:22 AM
1996 Sport GLS 13' - 1996 Johnson 40hp, 2 Stroke |
|
|
|
spuds |
Posted on 09/25/14 - 6:34 AM
|
Member
Personal Page
Posts: 166
Comments:
5
Joined: 08/01/07
|
Interesting that Power Pole is using an anchoring system similar to a Talon. Talons are higher priced than the Micro Power Pole. For the extra money on a Talon you get wave absorption which compensates for waves moving your hull up and down. It appears that a Micro PP is fixed and leaving it susceptible to be broken easily.
But I'm an ocean guy with a Nauset, What do I know?
1985 Outrage 18 |
|
|